On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Robert Clausecker <fuzxxl@gmail.com> wrote:

Image you would create your own language with a paradigm similar to
Haskell or have to chance to change Haskell without the need to keep any
compatibility. What stuff would you add to your language, what stuff
would you remove and what problems would you solve completely different?

Thanks in advance for all answers, yours

One thing that concerns me is the use of capital letters to distinguish type and class names and constructors from values. If I was doing it over I would use a typographical distinction like italics for types, bold for classes. That way we could have a constructor named ∅, a function named ∈, a class named ℝ.