Hey Tom,
Thanks for clarifying the money position.
> Serokell does not financially benefit from this initiative.
It's probably worth making this clear in the terms of service or otherwise (as Georgi hinted at).
But I would also note that clearly Serokell want their name attached to it; so they definitely do benefit implicitly from the endorsement.
I do still think it's a shame that the HF is attempting to adopt this as a somehow "formal" "ability in Haskell measure"; to my simple mind this is a very large overstep for a language's foundation to make; i.e. it should be taken very seriously, if HF somehow represents "Haskell" officially. I.e. my only personal course of action is just to assume that it, in fact, does not represent all our interests; which, of course, you will not be surprised, to learn is my true feeling :)
But myself aside, I do think some care needs to be taken; i.e. to explain clearly why the HF hasn't chosen to select this as "one among many options"; i.e. just link to it, compared to making it "the" url for certification for Haskell; and likewise writing the content to imply that.
--
Noon