If I had to guess, I'd say that was likely around when Austin was playing with the way we handle submodules. There was a bunch of churn on that front in 2013-2014 or so.

-Edward

On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Dimitri DeFigueiredo <defigueiredo@ucdavis.edu> wrote:

Hello folks,

I was looking at this:

https://www.openhub.net/p/ghc/analyses/latest/languages_summary

And was really surprised by the graph. Is this correct!?
Did the complexity of GHC's codebase significantly increase in 2014?
Can anybody shed a light on why that is?

Cheers,

Dimitri

--
2E45 D376 A744 C671 5100 A261 210B 8461 0FB0 CA1F

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to:
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.