Hello Chris and thanks for your effort in making Haskell more understandable to everyone. I hope that you will be open to an opinion which differs from the many enthusiastic comments you usually receive.
I do not want to sound grumpy, but i need to say that i am not ecstatic about the idea of this book, so i hope that it will not become a sort of mandatory reference for the Haskell community.
I do not consider the book and its research effort a bad thing, but i value existing resources and processes used by the Haskell community to document the language and the related theory. I don't think that getting into the details is useful here, i just want to mention that someone might be not interested in this project, and i hope that the choice not to read the book will be respected in all Haskell's public fora.
I sincerely hope not to start a flame. You do not have to convince me, i might buy the book tomorrow. I just want to mention the risk to consider this very extensive and comprehensive work as the *only* or the *best* way to learn Haskell. This would take some precious diversity away from us.