On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Tom Ellis <tom-lists-haskell-cafe-2013@jaguarpaw.co.uk> wrote:

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:26:42AM -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote:
> My understanding is that there's a rework of Arrow in progress that may
> change this in the future, since *theoretical* Arrows are more distinct,
> flexible and useful than the current implementation.

I'd like to know more about that if you can provide any references.  I am using
arrows very heavily.

It's been mentioned (but not much more) in #haskell IRC, so I don't know details. I also expect it's not going to simply replace the current one, at least not initially; and I think it's supposed to maintain compatibility with the current Arrow because that's just a specialization to the function arrow.

--

brandon s allbery kf8nh                               sine nomine associates

allbery.b@gmail.com                                  ballbery@sinenomine.net

unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad        http://sinenomine.net

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe