Would it make sense to write wrappers of Data.Binary functions to emulate the networking functions that are usually expected?<br><div><br clear="all">/jve<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 8:23 PM, Bryan O&#39;Sullivan <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:bos@serpentine.com">bos@serpentine.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
2008/12/27 John Van Enk <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:vanenkj@gmail.com" target="_blank">vanenkj@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div class="Ih2E3d"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left:1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex">

<br><div>Currently this only has:</div>
<div><ul><li>htons</li><li>htonl</li><li>ntohs</li><li>ntohl</li></ul></div></blockquote></div><div>This is all subsumed by the binary package (Data.Binary), where it makes a lot more sense in any instance. <br></div></div>

</blockquote></div><br></div>