Yes, I was really surprised that this was the case. I while ago I did a little FRP experiment. I made a top level binding to a list of timer event occurrences. The list was generated on another thread.&nbsp;To my surprise, I did not have space leak, which is amazingly cool, but it felt odd :) Is it documented when GHC will garbage collect CAFs? &nbsp;<div>
<div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div><br></div><div><div><div><div><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
FUD! &nbsp;CAFs are definitely garbage collected, in fact we have a big lump of code generator and runtime complexity (Static Reference Tables, SRTs) to ensure that they do.<br>
<br>
However, GHCi doesn&#39;t always GC CAFs, perhaps that&#39;s what you meant.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br><font color="#888888">
 &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Simon</font><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Haskell-Cafe mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org" target="_blank">Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe" target="_blank">http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>