Hi there,<div><br></div><div>I&#39;ve only dabbled in Haskell, so please excuse my ignorance: why isn&#39;t there a 1-to-1 mapping between libraries and modules?</div><div><br></div><div>As I understand it, a library can provide any number of unrelated modules, and conversely, a single module could be provided by more than one library. I can see how this affords library authors more flexibility, but at a cost: there is no longer a single, unified view of the library universe. (The alternative would be for every module to be its own, hermetic library.) So I&#39;m very interested in the rationale behind that aspect of the library system.</div>

<div><br></div><div>Thanks!</div><div> Alvaro</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br><div><br></div></div>