I was indeed talking about software contracts. I should perhaps have made that clearer, since I had of course come across SPJ's financial contract paper due to a similar confusion on Google's part.

Liquid Haskell looks great; might not have been quite what I imagined, but it's definitely more interesting.


On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Duncan Coutts <duncan@well-typed.com> wrote:
On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 17:48 +0100, Colin Adams wrote:
> I thought the OP was talking about software contracts (as in Eiffel /
> Design By Contract ).

Oh oops, you're right. SPJ has too many papers about contracts! :-)

> On 7 August 2013 16:15, Duncan Coutts <duncan@well-typed.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2013-08-05 at 23:13 -0400, Julian Arni wrote:
> > > I've come across interesting papers - and old, sometimes inaccessible,
> > > repositories - related contracts in Haskell (Dana Xu and SPJ's papers;
> > > haskellcontracts and the Programatica Project). And then some newer,
> > > apparently not quite mature projects (Dan Rosen's repositories, for
> > > instance). Is there anything in between - mature, but not abandoned?
> >
> > We did an implementation of the contracts idea for one of our customers
> > which is available (under AGPL or commercial license) on github:
> >
> > https://github.com/netrium/Netrium
> >
> > --
> > Duncan Coutts, Haskell Consultant
> > Well-Typed LLP, http://www.well-typed.com/
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
> > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
> >


--
Duncan Coutts, Haskell Consultant
Well-Typed LLP, http://www.well-typed.com/