Hello,

I was recently intrigued by this style of argument on haskell cafe:

One can write a function
Eq a => ((a -> Bool) -> a) -> [a]
that enumerates the elements of the set. Because we have universal quantification, this list can not be infinite. Which makes sense, topologically: These so-called searchable sets are topologically compact, and the Eq constraint means the space is discrete. Compact subsets of a discrete space are finite.

-------

I've seen arguments like these "in the wild" during Scott topology construction and in some other weird places (hyperfunctions), but I've never seen a systematic treatment of this.

I'd love to have a reference (papers / textbook preferred) to self learn this stuff!

Thanks

Siddharth

--

Sending this from my phone, please excuse any typos!

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to:
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.