On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Johan Tibell <johan.tibell@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Bryan O'Sullivan <bos@serpentine.com> wrote:
> I propose that the sense of the recommendation around upper bounds in the
> PVP be reversed: upper bounds should be specified only when there is a known
> problem with a new version of a depended-upon package.

This argument precisely captures my feelings on this subject. I will
be removing upper bounds next time I make releases of my packages.

So we are certain that the rounds of failures that led to their being *added* will never happen again?

--
brandon s allbery                                      allbery.b@gmail.com
wandering unix systems administrator (available)     (412) 475-9364 vm/sms