Hi Daniel,

Thanks for your feedback!

I'll give it a try to match last two Haskell platforms, that sound reasonable.

How one should deal with such thing, I suppose having some docker container template for each platform version would be helpful? (specially when having to do that for multiple lib)

Cheers

Alois

On 3 July 2014 07:20, Daniel Trstenjak <daniel.trstenjak@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Alois,

> Should I know what is the lowest possible combination of my dependencies who
> would compile... because if I'm too strict it might be difficult for some user
> to install? or maybe I should target as lowest what is in current
> haskell-platform?

Yes, looking at the last two haskell platforms might be a good pragmatical choice.

I even like the idea that much that I might add a feature to my own dependency
handling tool cabal-bounds[1]:

   cabal-bounds update --lower --haskel-platform=2012.4.0.0 ...


I think that getting the lower dependencies "right" is more an issue for
libraries, because in the case of applications a cabal sandbox can avoid
most of the possible problems.


Greetings,
Daniel

[1] https://github.com/dan-t/cabal-bounds
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

--

A\ois

http://twitter.com/aloiscochard

http://github.com/aloiscochard