Thanks, this explanation is what I was looking for. Wikipeidia has an explanation on it also:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_F#System
daryoush
Haskell's type system is decidable, so you can't let the type systemDaryoush Mehrtash wrote:
> Is there a way to define a type with qualification on top of existing
> type (e.g. prime numbers)? Say for example I want to define a
> computation that takes a prime number and generates a string. Is there
> any way I can do that in Haskell?
check arbitrary properties. It probably is possible in C++ by some
template hack (C++ templates are Turing complete), but not in Haskell.
But, as mentioned in the other responses, you can
- use a representation that makes it impossible to use wrong values
(-> Ketil's n-th prime representation)
- check values at runtime (-> Luke's repsonse)
//Stephan
--
Früher hieß es ja: Ich denke, also bin ich.
Heute weiß man: Es geht auch so.
- Dieter Nuhr
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe