On Nov 27, 2007 10:43 AM, Maurício <
briqueabraque@yahoo.com> wrote:
Hi,
If available memory is low, is the
garbage collector going to eliminate
data that is still referenced, but
it knows it can be recalculated when
needed?
If I understand it correctly, when a thunk is evaluated, it is actually
replaced by its value in memory. This suggests that once evaluated, it
is impossible to reconstruct the code that was actually used to produce
a given value (short of simply rerunning the entire program). The
overhead of keeping around all the code necessary to reproduce any
value would be enormous and would clearly cause far more problems with
regards to memory usage than it solved. =)
As far as I know, the garbage collector only deallocates memory that is no longer referenced.
-Brent