You might also want to check out Chronicle monad in these package: https://hackage.haskell.org/package/these-0.6.2.1/docs/Control-Monad-Chronicle.html

Kind regards,
Nick
On Sat, 6 Feb 2016 at 11:58, Roman Cheplyaka <roma@ro-che.info> wrote:
It sounds like you want the Validation applicative functor.
See e.g. https://ro-che.info/articles/2015-05-02-smarter-validation

On 02/06/2016 04:58 AM, Lian Hung Hon wrote:
> Dear haskellers,
>
> I have a multi-step computation. The steps are predefined, but users can
> choose which steps to execute (something like a recipe). Here is an
> example recipe:
>
> Step 1 - Get data from network (multiple HTTP calls) and put into a list
> Step 2 - Process the data (e.g. average, sum, median, etc.)
> Step 3 - Persist result to database
>
> Sometimes, Step 1 can fail for some of the HTTP calls. When this
> happens, Step 2 should continue as much as possible using whatever data
> that has been retrieved, but somehow indicate that an error has occurred
> and the result is partial.
>
> Q1: What is the idiomatic way of achieving this? Using throwError in
> Control.Monad.Except aborts the computation, which isn't what I want.
>
> Q2: (General software design) Furthermore, where should the error be
> logged? Logging it in both Step 1 and 2 preserves modularity for each of
> the steps, unfortunately it would result in duplicate error messages.
> What is the best practice for this?
>
> Regards,
> Hon
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
>


_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe