It's reasonably easy to read.
But you could make it more readable. Type signatures, naming the first lambda...
While using Haskell, I often find myself writing convoluted
constructions such as this:
show_system =
unlines .
zipWith
(\l ms ->
"Eq" ++
show l ++
": " ++
(concat $ intersperse " + " $ zipWith (\n x -> x ++ " x" ++ show
n) [1..] (init ms)) ++
" = " ++
last ms
)
[1..] .
map (map (take 8 . show))
And people complain that *Perl* is bad? This function is quite obviously
absurd. I mean, it works, but can *you* figure out what it does without
running it? The question is, can anybody think of a better way to write
this function? (And more generally, functions like it.)
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe