On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Yitzchak Gale <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:gale@sefer.org">gale@sefer.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">Dmitri wrote:<br>
&gt; I need to call Stanford NLP Parser from Haskell<br>
</div>&gt; (unfortunately Haskell does not have a similar one)...<br>
<br>
Just out of curiosity, why do you not consider GF<br>
at all similar? To an outsider like me, there does<br>
appear to be quite a bit of similarity.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.grammaticalframework.org/" target="_blank">http://www.grammaticalframework.org/</a><br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Yitz<br>
</blockquote><div><br></div><div><div class="gmail_quote"><div>As I understand GF is well suited for parsing well defined formal languages. Not sure that GF can be used as NLP parser for blog messages that I need. Please correct me if I am wrong.</div>
<div><br></div><div>As a general note, Java has tons of useful libraries that will take infinite time to re-implement in Haskell. To my mind it makes a lot of sense to have a reliable mechanism to call Java from Haskell.</div>
<div>BTW, yet another way to do this: wrap Java library in RESTFUL web service )</div></div><br>-- <br></div>All the best,<br>Dmitri O. Kondratiev<br><br>&quot;This is what keeps me going: discovery&quot;<br><a href="mailto:dokondr@gmail.com" target="_blank">dokondr@gmail.com</a><br>
<a href="http://sites.google.com/site/dokondr/welcome" target="_blank">http://sites.google.com/site/dokondr/welcome</a><br><br><br>