> This is one of the notational issues where I venture to disagree
> with the Master. It's on a par with arguing that a number like
> 1234 would be easier to read as 1`2`3`4 where the semantics of
> x`y is x*10+y.
Thanks Richard, and more to the point/dot:
If dot means function application then `3.14` must be `3` applied to `14`.
Or perhaps the Master expects Floats to be written European-style with commas?
Good luck with that in Haskell. Let's also use Euro-style space as thousands separator!
Or perhaps Dijkstra as more mathematician doesn't dirty his hands with Floats.
Meta: all the above is tongue-in-cheek.
AntC