On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Thomas Davie
<tom.davie@gmail.com> wrote:
On 26 Sep 2008, at 17:51, Jonathan Cast wrote:
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 12:17 +0200, Thomas Davie wrote:
On 26 Sep 2008, at 12:12, Janis Voigtlaender wrote:
Manlio Perillo wrote:
When I compare GPL and MIT/BSD licenses, I do a simple reasoning.
Suppose a doctor in a battle field meet a badly injuried enemy.
Should he help the enemy?
I'm so glad I don't understand this ;-)
Should you decide not to give someone something based on the fact that
you either don't like them, or don't like what they'll do with the
thing you give them.
I think the standard answer to your question is that you get the enemy
to *surrender* first, patch him up enough to move him, and then stick
him in a POW camp for the duration, or until you get something in return
for releasing him.
I would never patch someone up so he can go back to *shooting* at me, or
my friends. Never.
Yet doctors all abide by the hypocratic(sp?) oath.