Because he would have either to recompile the whole program or to use things like hint, both implying that GHC must be installed on the user side (600Mo+ for GHC 6.12.3)Isn't there a way to use some stripped-down version of ghc and the base libraries, providing only what the user really needs, in versions which are known to work, and supply that together with the application?
2010/11/2 Lennart Augustsson <lennart@augustsson.net>
I don't understand. Why don't you use Haskell as the scripting language?
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 7:04 AM, Permjacov Evgeniy <permeakra@gmail.com> wrote:
> Let us think, that we need some scripting language for our pure haskell
> project and configure-compile-run is not a way. In such a case a
> reasonably simple, yet standartized and wide known language should be
> implemented. What such language may be?
> R(4/5/6)RS ?
> EcmaScript ?
> Some other ?
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
>
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe