Hi,
I am currently learning Haskell, and really enjoying it, thankyou to the community for this well considered language.
I have started using the async library, and I can't quite figure out some of the documentation, and I wonder if someone could help.

https://hackage.haskell.org/package/async-2.2.2/docs/Control-Concurrent-Async.html#g:3

Makes the comment that: "This is a useful variant of async that ensures an Async is never left running unintentionally." However, I can't see how I would use this.

To make the example more concrete, I have a function that looks like this:


runNodeHwBridgeUdp :: NodeHwInterface -> NodeHwUdpConfig-> IO()
runNodeHwBridgeUdp (NodeHwInterface l0up l0down) config = do
  putStrLn "Starting Node bridge"

  -- Launch all the subprocesses:
  t0 <- async $  (runMsgUpReader hwBridgeSharedData l0up)
  t1 <- async $  (evalStateT (runUDPWriter hwBridgeSharedData) (initialUdpDispatchData timeUs) )
  t2 <- async $  (runUDPReader hwBridgeSharedData l0down)

  putStrLn "Created child processes. Waiting...."
  (a, is_exception) <- waitAnyCatchCancel [t0, t1, t2]

  case is_exception of
    Right _ -> do
            error "SHOULD NOT GET HERE"
    Left exception -> do
            case (fromException exception) of
              Just (ex :: HwDestroyException) -> do
                putStrLn $ "BRIDGE ENDING: >>>> GOOD: SHUTDOWN: " ++ show exception
              Nothing -> do
                  throwIO exception
  return ()


This process launches 3 child processes, and then waits on them. I launch this function as an async-process, and it would be really helpful if when I "cancel"ed it, it would also also cancelled the children, but I don't understand how I would structure that...

  t0 <- withAsync $  (runMsgUpReader hwBridgeSharedData l0up) $ \async -> do 
         ????
  t1 <- withAsync $  (evalStateT (runUDPWriter hwBridgeSharedData) (initialUdpDispatchData timeUs) ) $ \async -> do 
         ????
  t2 <- async $  (runUDPReader hwBridgeSharedData l0down) $ \async -> do 
         ????

I feel like I must be missing something here. 
I'd appreciate any input; many thanks for your time,



Mike