> ... which means that implementers should be free to "fix" data type contexts"Remembering" data type contexts shouldn't break existing code, unless it's
> however they like, as they are now complier extensions which won't conflict
> with standard Haskell.
>
> Except that people do build older programs with newer Haskell compilers,
and it's bad to "repurpose" a syntax like that because it leads to strange
errors.
semantically broken already. (I'm sure that anyone could come up with a
theoretical example of code which would break
- but would it break any
real-world code?)