On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 5:54 PM,  <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:timothyhobbs@seznam.cz" target="_blank">timothyhobbs@seznam.cz</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div><p>  There seems to be a bit of a clash between ghc being a tool, and ghc being a toy.  There need not be.  Your works-for-me is great but it is meaningless to those of us who use ghc as a tool for larger projects.</p>
</div></blockquote><div>This is not specific to GHC. Arch Linux, being a bleeding-edge Linux distribution, tends to prefer newer versions of software over more stable versions of software. I doubt that facet of Arch Linux will ever change, so perhaps you should reevaluate your choice of Linux distribution or avoid pacman/package updates for software whose stability and predictability is critical to you.</div>
</div>