Hi Tony,<br><br>I&#39;m glad for your interest in Reactive.&nbsp; Yes, it is certainly being developed actively.&nbsp; To start you off with realistic expectations, I&#39;d like you to know that Reactive currently has one or more sneaky laziness bugs that block serious application at the moment.&nbsp; While the Reactive implementation is almost entirely pure (free of IO), it has some quite subtle aspects, and it&#39;s taking a while to get it solid.&nbsp; There&#39;s also a new higher-level programming model on the way, as hinted at in my blog.<br>
<br>Welcome!<br><br>&nbsp; - Conal<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2008/12/19 Tony Hannan <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:tonyhannan2@gmail.com">tonyhannan2@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi guys,<br><br>Thanks for the comments and lively discussion. After reading these posts, a few papers, and Conal&#39;s blogs, I&#39;m going to try Reactive because it is newer and thus likely to incorporate most of the good things from past FRP sytems including Yampa, actively being developed, and mature enough to start using now.<br>

<br>I&#39;ll see you on the Reactive mailing list.<br><br>Cheers,<br><font color="#888888">Tony<br><br>
</font><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Haskell-Cafe mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org">Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe" target="_blank">http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>