On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Felipe Lessa <felipe.lessa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Tim Matthews <tim.matthews7@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have often wondered "OK haml implemented now what about sass". Michael
> Snoyman what is your opinions on sass? Would a sass inspired syntax like you
> did with the haml->hamlet fit in well and if so, as it often best to keep
> styles separate, could a quasi quoted language live in in a separate haskell
> module and then at run time it recreates the separate css files on first
> launch?

A wholly statically-verified-by-the-compiler Web framework?!  We are
going to avoid success at all costs even more, I'd say. ;-)

I hope you mean *fail* to avoid success at all costs ;)

Michael