Hello,<br><br>      Several days ago I posted a question about retargeting GHC to generate CIL so that Haskell could be a .NET language. One objection was Haskell &quot;lazy&quot; nature didn&#39;t fit well with .NET&#39;s CLR. I found a couple publications ....<br>
<br><a href="http://www.ddj.com/windows/184404967;jsessionid=0AVCEATVAEGKMQSNDLOSKH0CJUNN2JVN?_requestid=33708">http://www.ddj.com/windows/184404967;jsessionid=0AVCEATVAEGKMQSNDLOSKH0CJUNN2JVN?_requestid=33708</a>  ... more popular presentation<br>
<br><a href="http://docs.msdnaa.net/ark_new/Webfiles/WhitePapers/ECOOP.pdf">http://docs.msdnaa.net/ark_new/Webfiles/WhitePapers/ECOOP.pdf</a>    ... this paper seems to be saying that Mondrian&#39;s &quot;lazy&quot; nature fits in quite well<br>
<br>Any opinions from Mondrian people &quot;listening&quot; in? What lessons were learned from the Mondrian experience that could speak to Haskell in particular GHC?<br><br>Regards, Vasili<br>