On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Felipe Almeida Lessa <felipe.lessa@gmail.com> wrote:

On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Michael Snoyman <michael@snoyman.com> wrote:
> The only
> approach that handles the situation correctly is John's separate thread
> approach (tryAll3).

I think you meant "tryAll2" here. Got me confused for some time =).

Cheers,

--
Felipe.

Doh, yes, I did, thanks for the clarification.

After playing around with this a bit, I was able to get an implementation of try, catch, and handle which work for any non-async exception, in monad transformers which are instances of MonadBaseControl (from monad-control). I'll try to write up my thoughts in something more coherent, likely a blog post.

Michael