How about an FFI call to rand() and then measure the performance
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Eugene Kirpichov <ekirpichov@gmail.com> wrote:And I would like to notice that rand() is incredibly dumber than the
> Here is a variant that uses mersenne-random-pure64 and works less than
> 2x slower than C++:
Mersenne twister, so probably if we took rand()'s code from glibc and
rewrote it in Haskell, there would be another performance increase.
--
Felipe.
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe