_______________________________________________Hi List,I noticed, that I pay more attention than I should, when working with assertions, because I am not sure about argument order i.e. whether the expected value goes first or vice-versa. Does anybody have similar thought?
Such subtle detail should be easy to grasp with regular practice, but I observe difficulties and I suspect that there is a logical reason for that.
Unit tests appeared long time ago in Java and spread over all languages. HUnit library inherited de facto standard assert function name and signature. I don't know reasoning behind original signature.
I spell "assertEqual" expression as: "Assert that x equals to y"
"y" sounds like a model value (i.e. expected value).In assignments
"x <- y"
y is the model value, because it defines"x"
.
You get"x"
- value on the left not on the right.Similar issue with test fixing - I always have to check first, that an expected value is actually one. There is no type safety preventing mixing arguments. I had to open and comprehend a source file with test, because test log is not 100% safe.
--
Best regards,
Daniil Iaitskov
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
To (un)subscribe, modify options or view archives go to:
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Only members subscribed via the mailman list are allowed to post.