Little things to check understanding:

* ghc/ghci implements a DSL called Haskell -- does it do so in a deep or shallow way?

* where are the shallow DSLs? the deep ones? (hint: some of them are right under our very noses!)

-- Kim-Ee


On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Stephen Tetley <stephen.tetley@gmail.com> wrote:
In Haskell, shallow DSLs generate values - deep DSLs generate
structures (typically abstract syntax trees), the structure can
subsequently be used to generate a value (or a C program, or a HTML
page, etc.).

See Andy Gill and colleagues "Types and Type Families for Hardware
Simulation and Synthesis, The Internals and Externals of Kansas Lava"
for a fuller definition.

http://www.ittc.ku.edu/csdl/fpg/sites/default/files/Gill-10-TypesKansasLava.pdf

Other communities may have their own definitions.

On 4 December 2012 10:01, Kim-Ee Yeoh <ky3@atamo.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Joerg Fritsch <fritsch@joerg.cc> wrote:
>> is a shallow embedded DSL == an internal DSL and a deeply embedded DSL ==
>> an external DSL or the other way around?
>
> Roughly speaking, yes. But a deep DSL doesn't mean you've got to have a
> parser << tokenizer << IO input. You can get a deep DSL merely from the free
> monad construction.
>
> -- Kim-Ee

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe