Given the winner, the possible variations are limited to color (oh, boy), coloring (lambda accented, bind accented or all the same) and possible font-like things such as the line shapes (much like George Pollard did with his variant, entry #50, placed 9th).

I agree that we should have only one more round of voting.

I also like the idea of choosing a logo without text, much like the now standard feed icon ( http://www.feedicons.com/ ). It allows for international recognition without dependency on language. It also can be flexibly used for web and t-shirt designs with multiple fonts. In fact, I would expect to see a version of this logo become the new favicon ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Favicon ) for haskell.org and other sites, and there's no room for text there.

Having multiple color combinations would be a bonus. Again, see the feed icon for a decent example.

I would also like to see how one image looks at different scales, e.g. feed icon (of course) and very large (for posters). This isn't necessarily a single image scaled, of course, but it should be obvious that an icon comes from the same design as a poster splash.

My preference would be to have one person with sense of (and education in, if possible) design make some nice looking variations and have a second (final) round of voting, but, we could also do the wiki-thing again ;)