On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Matthew <wonderzombie@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm a somewhat experienced coder but I am relatively new to Haskell.
I've got a question about whether a usage of do notation is idiomatic,
or whether it's better to use pattern matching.

I've got two functions which take an input and return Maybe SomeType.
If either returns Nothing, I also want to return Nothing. If they both
return something, then I'll return something unrelated.

With do notation, I can write something like this:

        do
          foo <- callFoo x
          bar <- callBar x
          return (baz)

Alternatively, there's a straightforward pattern match. After binding
foo, bar in a couple of where clauses:

        case (foo,bar) of (Just x, Just y) -> baz
                          _                -> Nothing

So which approach is more idiomatic, do you think?

The short answer is to write a "one liner" using (>>=) and (>>), unless you need to bind more than one value to a variable.  In that case, you should use an applicative interface, if available and otherwise possible, and finally do-notation.