There&#39;s a concensus email? Im pretty sure most folks don&#39;t check cafe threads for rfcs :-)<span></span><br><br>On Friday, April 18, 2014, Johan Tibell &lt;<a href="mailto:johan.tibell@gmail.com">johan.tibell@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Alexander Berntsen <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,&#39;cvml&#39;,&#39;alexander@plaimi.net&#39;);" target="_blank">alexander@plaimi.net</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>


<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br>
Hash: SHA256<br>
<br>
</div><div>On 18/04/14 12:31, Johan Tibell wrote:<br>
&gt; So far our decision has been &quot;no&quot;.<br>
</div>You are mistaken. Please see Edward&#39;s email.<br>
<br>
«Consensus was achieved to add it as an infixl 1 &amp; operator to<br>
<div>Data.Function, but not to Prelude,so we just need to put in the patch<br>
</div>and you&#39;ll see it in GHC 7.10.»<br>
<br>
A patch has been provided and a GHC ticket has been opened.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>My apologies. I must have glanced over the details since I&#39;ve seen &#39;&amp;&#39; and &#39;|&gt;&#39; proposed before on this list. Please link to the consensus email in the GHC ticket (I saw one of them got closed because it didn&#39;t.)</div>


<div><br></div></div></div></div>
</blockquote>