Thanks for the graceful reply! So as not to think I'm singling anyone out, I should say the "hatchet job" comment above is also the kind of thing very few of us want to be part of our day-to-day conversation.

Everyone makes mistakes, not a big thing! It's just important that, on average, when people come visit our corner of the internet the thing they see isn't people saying hurtful things to each other. When I started here I felt like I could ask a question and not be ridiculed for it. Others should have the same feeling when they come by.

Thanks!
Tom


On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Michael Sloan <mgsloan@gmail.com> wrote:
Fair point, my mistake, sorry.  I will try to tone it down and be a
more civil communicator.  To me equating the Haskell Platform with
python's batteries included approach is laughable, so I laughed.

I find Brandon's opinions on things to often be diametrically opposed
to my own, and this seems to be a cause of a great deal of contention.

-Michael

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 8:20 PM, Tom Murphy <amindfv@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Michael Sloan <mgsloan@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> LOL! Oh man, this guy must be pulling my leg... Haskell platform was
>> never a batteries included plan.  It was a plan for package
>> bureaucracy, mixed in with a broken installation approach.  Sorry, but
>> that was not a good enough attempt at emulating python's "batteries
>> included" . From https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0206/
>>
>
> The substance of your positions on packaging/HP aside, it has been 15 hours
> since SPJ's email about having more respectful discussion in our community.
> Please speak with civility.
>
> Tom
>
>