No problem. Haskell is a different animal than even other functional languages in my experience, and it takes time to get used to the coolness in the type system, the lazy evaluation, the point free style, functional composition and all the other interesting techniques you now have at your fingertips for writing very expressive code :-).
Hi, all.
Plenty of answers. Thank you.
Putting the list in the IO monad was deliberate. Another one I was looking at was
f :: String -> IO String
f s = do return s
main = do ios <- f "hello"
fmap tail ios
which worked fine
So, the big error was trying to add 1 + [1,2,3,4,5].
I considered that I needed an additional fmap and thought I had tried
fmap (fmap (1+)) iol
but must have messed it up, because I got an error. I guess I was on the right track.
I like to try various combinations to test my understanding. It's kind of embarrassing when I get stumped by something simple like this, but that's how one learns.
Thanks again,
Michael
--- On Fri, 12/17/10, Daniel Fischer <daniel.is.fischer@googlemail.com> wrote:
From: Daniel Fischer <daniel.is.fischer@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Why is Haskell flagging this?
To: haskell-cafe@haskell.org
Cc: "michael rice" <nowgate@yahoo.com>
Date: Friday, December 17, 2010, 4:24 PM
On Friday 17 December 2010 18:04:20, michael rice wrote:
> I don't understand this error message. Haskell appears not to understand
> that 1 is a Num.
>> Prelude> :t 1The fmap is relative to IO, your code is equivalent to
> 1 :: (Num t) => t
> Prelude> :t [1,2,3,4,5]
> [1,2,3,4,5] :: (Num t) => [t]
> Prelude>
>
> Michael
>
> ===================
>
> f :: [Int] -> IO [Int]
> f lst = do return lst
>
> main = do let lst = f [1,2,3,4,5]
> fmap (+1) lst
do let lst = (return [1,2,3,4,5])
fmap (+1) lst
~>
fmap (+1) (return [1,2,3,4,5])
~>
do lst <- return [1,2,3,4,5]
return $ (+1) lst
but there's no instance Num [Int] in scope
You probably meantfmap (map (+1)) lst
do let lst = f [1,2,3,4,5]--- On Fri, 12/17/10, Daniel Fischer <daniel.is.fischer@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> ===============================
>
> Prelude> :l test
> [1 of 1] Compiling Main ( test.hs, interpreted )
>
> test.hs:5:17:
> No instance for (Num [Int])
> arising from the literal `1' at test.hs:5:17
> Possible fix: add an instance declaration for (Num [Int])
> In the second argument of `(+)', namely `1'
> In the first argument of `fmap', namely `(+ 1)'
> In the expression: fmap (+ 1) lst
> Failed, modules loaded: none.
> Prelude>
From: Daniel Fischer <daniel.is.fischer@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Why is Haskell flagging this?
To: haskell-cafe@haskell.org
Cc: "michael rice" <nowgate@yahoo.com>
Date: Friday, December 17, 2010, 4:24 PMOn Friday 17 December 2010 18:04:20, michael rice wrote:
> I don't understand this error message. Haskell appears not to understand
> that 1 is a Num.
>> Prelude> :t 1The fmap is relative to IO, your code is equivalent to
> 1 :: (Num t) => t
> Prelude> :t [1,2,3,4,5]
> [1,2,3,4,5] :: (Num t) => [t]
> Prelude>
>
> Michael
>
> ===================
>
> f :: [Int] -> IO [Int]
> f lst = do return lst
>
> main = do let lst = f [1,2,3,4,5]
> fmap (+1) lst
do let lst = (return [1,2,3,4,5])
fmap (+1) lst
~>
fmap (+1) (return [1,2,3,4,5])
~>
do lst <- return [1,2,3,4,5]
return $ (+1) lst
but there's no instance Num [Int] in scope
You probably meantfmap (map (+1)) lst
do let lst = f [1,2,3,4,5]
>
> ===============================
>
> Prelude> :l test
> [1 of 1] Compiling Main ( test.hs, interpreted )
>
> test.hs:5:17:
> No instance for (Num [Int])
> arising from the literal `1' at test.hs:5:17
> Possible fix: add an instance declaration for (Num [Int])
> In the second argument of `(+)', namely `1'
> In the first argument of `fmap', namely `(+ 1)'
> In the expression: fmap (+ 1) lst
> Failed, modules loaded: none.
> Prelude>
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe