+1 to ":types". Easy to remember as well: "Do I want one type, or multiple types?".

On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Jack Henahan <jhenahan@me.com> wrote:
What about :type for the normal behavior and :type! for specializations? With the notion that it could be extended to provide multiple specializations, I could also see :types (both meaning "display multiple example types" and serving as a mnemonic for :types[pecialization]) being viable.