On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 13:16, Aleksey Khudyakov <alexey.skladnoy@gmail.com> wrote:
On 20.01.2012 00:37, Nicholas Tung wrote:
Dear all,
I wanted to voice support for a partial type annotations. Here's my
usage scenario: I have a monad for an imperative EDSL, which has an
associated expression data type,
I wanted such extension more than once. For me it's useful when compiler can almost infer type and only few type variables are actually required. Now I have to either type full signature or invert functions a la `asTypeOf'
class (Monad m, Expression (ExprTyp m)) => MyDSLMonad m where
data ExprTyp m :: * -> *
and you write imperative EDSL code like so,
my_code_block = do
x <- instruction1
y <- instruction2 (x + x)
...
I want the user to be able to annotate "x is an Integer". However,
to do that now, one has to now add a type signature for my_code_block
like so, so that the $m$ variable is in scope,
my_code_block :: forall m. MyDSLMonad m => m ()
my_code_block = do
x :: ExprTyp m Integer <- instruction1
Actually it should be
> my_code_block :: ...
> my_code_block = do
> x :: Integer <- instruction1 -- Require ScopedTypeVariables
or
> x <- instruction1 :: Expr Integer
or with partial type signatures
> x <- instruction1 :: _ _ Integer
or wiht
> x <- instruction1
> y <- instrunctio2 (x + x :: Integer)
It's not important, but my example was what I meant -- I am creating an EDSL, and the values flowing through are actually syntax trees representing expressions. For example, "x + x" might create a tree with top node "+", and subtrees as "x". We then have type
instruction1 :: m (ExprTyp m Integer)
or using the shorthand, if there were partial signatures,
instruction1 :: m (Expr Integer)
regards,
Nicholas — https://ntung.com — 4432-nstung