Without a binding it is useless at top level, but if you strictify the pattern it can be useful in `let` (possibly as a sanity check where you want the program to abort if it fails). I don't recall offhand if it desugars usefully in list comprehensions, but if so it would work as a filter. There may also be other specialized use cases; general syntax tends to get reused a lot in Haskell, so making this case a syntax error could make it difficult to support actually useful cases. :)(Also I'm sure someone overly clever could figure out some way to abuse it. :)On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 10:41 PM, Harendra Kumar <harendr...@gmail.com> wrote:On 24 February 2017 at 08:45, Brandon Allbery <allb...@gmail.com> wrote:Literally the only use I've seen for this was a CCC puzzle. However, it is the trivial case of something that is more useful: pattern matching the result of an expression (say, a Data.Map.lookup when you know the key exists).Can you explain how that will be useful (without a binding)? Will the pattern match be ever actually tried when there is no binding?-harendra--brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associatesunix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net