Sorry, i meant ghci not cabal.

As for hsdev, in order to provide its features it will have to load and keep track of entire project information which is already done by ghc-mod and hdevtools separately. So you  ushould see how much effort is wasted on doing the same thing again and again in each of 4 different tools (ghci, ghc-mod, hdevtools and hsdev)

On Monday, March 10, 2014 12:32:25 PM UTC-7, Niklas Hambüchen wrote:

On 10/03/14 18:41, Vagif Verdi wrote:
> This is an excellent illustration of how fragmentation in this specific
> area hurts community. Not only you are forced to use 3 different tools
> (ghc-mod, hdevtools, cabal) each of which basically provides the same
> service but in an incompatible and incomplete way. But you decided to
> create yet another one instead of contributing to the ones you already
> use (they are all open source)

I'm not sure what you mean to say; ghc-mod and cabal certainly do not do
the same. Hsdev doesn't either, and claiming that we don't contribute to
these projects is strange.
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskel...@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe