hmm ok I understand the issue of compiler maturity. But I thought lazyness was meant to be a bonus? Or is it that if you really try to squeeze performance it becomes more of a hindrance?
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 1:47 AM, Bulat Ziganshin
<bulat.ziganshin@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Don,
Friday, November 27, 2009, 11:08:44 PM, you wrote:
>> it's just false assumption that you should got speed comparable to
>> other languages. haskell is lazy and ghc has much less mature compiler
> "comparable to other languages" eh?
> That seems a little too broad to be meaningful, Bulat, as we all know.
he compared to c++/java!