"Clint Adams" <clint@debian.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:45:48PM -0500, Clark Gaebel wrote:
> > This is a silly issue.
>
> It certainly seems to be.  If it were serious, I'd like to think
> that people would be attempting to get actual legal advice
> instead of spouting anti-copyleft FUD.

Well, actual legal advice comes from actual lawyers, who often want actual money.

I'm interested in what you saw as "anti-copyleft FUD" though.  That the code might be subject to the GPL and that caused problems?  That's the only thing that did come from a lawyer.  And it's really the only negative thing I saw about the GPL in this thread.