Agreed. Hence let's just have something less structured than the GitHub flow ... just any doc will do. Also it'd be simpler to have just one tool for coms.
On 2017-08-25 06:48 PM, Carter Schonwald wrote:
> I'll be this time! :)
>
> We should coord a committee catch-up at icfp.
>
> Also I would like to propose we shift back to email based discussion.
> There's still the valid and important need of then taking the
> discussion and revisions into a new standard. But let's at least make
> the first half lighter weight perhaps? the pattern that's working for
> ghc proposals doesn't seem to matchup with what works for h2020
I'll be there as well. As for the e-mail based discussion, my
feeling for the last while has been that I'd rather bring something,
anything, to completion. There's very little feedback and there's a real
danger that the discussion doesn't lead to any concrete change to the
standard.
_______________________________________________
Haskell-prime mailing list
Haskell-prime@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime