Oh. Simple enough. Thanks.
Another question: why the IO in readIVar :: IVar a -> IO a, instead of just readIVar :: IVar a -> a? After all, won't readIVar iv yield the same result (eventually) every time it's called?
You can make them from MVars.On Dec 2, 2007 8:03 PM, Conal Elliott <conal@conal.net> wrote:what became of (assign-once) IVars? afaict, they were in concurrent haskell and now aren't._______________________________________________
Haskell mailing list
Haskell@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell