On 8/14/07, Isaac Dupree <isaacdupree@charter.net> wrote:

Conal Elliott wrote:
> Hi David.  Thanks for the reply.
>
> I'm pretty confused.  I understand your first paragraph as saying *not* to
> use that repo, and the second as saying to use it.  Is the new haddock
> included in GHC 6.7 or is it still an app that works separately from GHC?
> If the latter, where is the app's repo?

haddock.ghc and ghc.haddock are different.  Haddock.ghc needs a GHC with
the patches from ghc.haddock.  The latest GHC 6.7 has ghc.haddock
patches.  Haddock.ghc is the new haddock, which requires those GHC
capabilities.  So you need GHC 6.7 *and* haddock.ghc.  Does that clear
up the rather confusing naming scheme?

Isaac
_______________________________________________
Haskell mailing list
Haskell@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell