I&#39;d say that OpenGL 3.2 is still the norm nowadays. Many graphics cards out there don&#39;t support OpenGL 4.x (meaning: no hardware support for tessellation). Mac OSX and Mesa both only support OpenGL 3.2.<div><br></div>

<div>You can read the OpenGL 4.3 specifications &quot;with changes marked&quot; to see what&#39;s different between the various releases. If you just want a synopsis, check out Wikipedia at <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenGL#OpenGL_4.0">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenGL#OpenGL_4.0</a> . </div>

<div><br></div><div>--Myles<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 6:58 AM, Thiago Negri <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:evohunz@gmail.com" target="_blank">evohunz@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">Hello.<div><br></div><div>I&#39;m quite new to OpenGL, so I don&#39;t know all features available.</div><div>The description of the OpenGLRaw package says it&#39;s a binding for OpenGL 3.2.</div>

<div>On the official site, the 3.2 specification version is from 2009. [1]</div><div><br></div><div>Why the Haskell binding uses version 3.2?</div><div>What OpenGL features I&#39;m missing by using Haskell instead of C?</div>



<div><br></div><div>Thanks.</div><div><br></div><div>[1] <a href="http://www.opengl.org/registry/" target="_blank">http://www.opengl.org/registry/</a></div><div><br></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
HOpenGL mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:HOpenGL@haskell.org">HOpenGL@haskell.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/hopengl" target="_blank">http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/hopengl</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>