Carter,
llvm-3.0 works and produces correctly working code,
llvm-3.1 is completely broken due to a regression in the area of GHC calling convention in ARM - and this was fixed in 3.2,
llvm >= 3.2 should work, but previously we couldn't build GHC because it's more 'fussy' about its input and GHC hadn't been changed to work with it. This may have been fixed since.
So llvm-3.0 is the only version that's absolutely confirmed to be working at present.
Steve
On 12/08/13 10:19, Carter Schonwald wrote:
commit e8aa8ccba0c40884765281b21ff8f4__411802dd41Why is llvm 3.0 required here? Could you enlighten me please?
On Sunday, August 11, 2013, Luke Iannini wrote:
Thanks! That’s all identical to my procedure except that I’m using
10.9 DP5/Xcode 5 DP5, so I guess that must play some role, though
I’m not sure what.
Re: iPod Touch authorization, if you haven’t tried in a few days or
so, Apple’s now claiming everything’s back online finally
https://developer.apple.com/support/system-status/
Cheers
Luke
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Stephen Blackheath [to GHC-iPhone]
<likeliest.complexions.stephen@blacksapphire.com> wrote:
Luke,
I didn't experience anything like you described. Here's as much
detail as I can think of about what I did:
* Mac OS/X 10.8.4
* Xcode 4.6
* ghc-7.6.3 downloaded from http://haskell.org/ghc as the
bootstrap compiler
* llvm - 3.0 built from source downloaded off the llvm site:
Low Level Virtual Machine (http://llvm.org/):
llvm version 3.0
Optimized build.
Built Jan 31 2012 (09:33:35).
Host: x86_64-apple-darwin12.4.0
Host CPU: penryn
Registered Targets:
alpha - Alpha [experimental]
arm - ARM
... and others ...
Before I had a problem with not enough memory but I bought some
more. So I got a cross compiler built, but wasn't able to test
it, because I can't authorize my iPod Touch for development at
the moment (Apple systems are down). So I can't verify that it
produces iOS executables that work.
The latest commit in the git log for GHC HEAD was this:
http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/__ghc/wiki/Building/__CrossCompiling/iOS
Author: Richard Eisenberg <eir@cis.upenn.edu>
Date: Fri Aug 2 15:47:03 2013 +0100
Implement "roles" into GHC.
...
I patched it as attached here (same patch as in my last email).
The procedure I used was exactly the one described atinteger-simple/GHC/Integer/__Type.hs.
<http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Building/CrossCompiling/iOS>
Thanks for your work on this! That problem you're having is
pretty weird!
Steve
On 11/08/13 20:14, Luke Iannini wrote:
And the truly final word for the moment : ) —
I built a tool to partially automate the indentation
workaround for LLVM
3.0 and it yields the same "co-processor offset out of
range"/"unsupported relocation on symbol LCPI65_0" errors
LLVM 3.3/3.4
did when it finally gets tohttp://llvm.org/releases/3.0/__clang+llvm-3.0-x86_64-apple-__darwin11.tar.gz
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 3:06 AM, Luke Iannini
<lukexipd@gmail.com
<mailto:lukexipd@gmail.com>> wrote:
OK! So just to summarize:
Building GHC HEAD with LLVM 3.0 or 3.2 (using GHC 7.6.3
as the
bootstrap) on OS X 10.9 DP5/Xcode 5 DP5 exhibits very
strange
behavior wherein layout-based code along with
mixed-tabs-and-spaces
code fails to parse correctly, with issues in hundreds
of files in
the GHC HEAD tree.
I don't have a 10.8 machine to check if this is a 10.9
exclusive
issue, so I'd love if someone can try using these
binaries to build
GHC HEAD:https://gist.github.com/__lukexi/2b129f34fa027172c5ee
<http://llvm.org/releases/3.0/clang+llvm-3.0-x86_64-apple-darwin11.tar.gz>
Building GHC HEAD with LLVM 3.3 or 3.4 works great as a
regular
compiler with the 10.9 workarounds I outlined in
another thread, but
fails when compiling as a cross-compiler (./configure
--target=arm-apple-darwin10) with these errors:
<https://gist.github.com/lukexi/2b129f34fa027172c5ee>
So I'm between a rock and a hard place at the moment.
The only (very tedious and slow) workaround I've found
for the
3.0/3.2 bug is to manually expand tabs to spaces, and
to transform
do x
y
into
do
x
y
(similarly for where and let blocks)
Cheers
Luke
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 1:53 AM, Luke Iannini
<lukexipd@gmail.com
<mailto:lukexipd@gmail.com>> wrote:
Arg