On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 9:48 PM, Neil Mitchell <ndmitchell@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi

>  I learned at school, and I teach my students,
>  * balanced binary tree: costs are log(size)
>  * hashtable: cost are essentially constant

All true, but log(1000) = 10 [nitpick, its nearly always log base 2,
not base 10]. 10 ~= constant.

>  ... but indeed some experiments with Data.Map and Data.Hashtable
>  support the point you made. That's either good for Data.Map
>  or bad for Data.Hashtable.

I think both of those are true. Hashtable isn't a natural functional
data structure, so is ignored, so is not improved. I suspect a Trie
would be a much better data structure for most of the uses of
Hashtable, but alas there is not one in the standard libraries.

How about this one?
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/containers/Data-IntMap.html

You can use that to build a purely functional hash table quite easily I suspect (giving you worst case constant time lookup, and no fixed size nonsense, or re-hashing etc.).


--
Sebastian Sylvan
+44(0)7857-300802
UIN: 44640862