Personally, I would support its inclusion.

It is an annoying repetition -- but then so is the entire bytestring API -- so there is no real point in just randomly omitting this one combinator.

-Edward

On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 6:58 AM, Artyom Kazak <yom@artyom.me> wrote:

Would this be an appropriate place to propose adding mapM_ (and then possibly mapM) to bytestring library?

Was it suggested before? If yes, why was it rejected?

_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
Libraries@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries