Yeah the -rc bit is In jest. But before settling maintainership, what fixes are needed for now? Let's do that then sort out maintainership on a slower time scale.
On Friday, May 9, 2014, Roman Cheplyaka <roma@ro-che.info> wrote:
* Erik Hesselink <hesselink@gmail.com> [2014-05-09 16:19:43+0200]
> Aren't you overreacting a bit? It's only been two days since your
> initial email...
In which way am I overreacting?
My initial email said:
> If I don't hear from you in two days, I'll request maintainership and/or
> fork the package.
And that's exactly what I did.
Or, if you're referring to the conversation with Carter, I don't think it was
meant seriously.
> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Roman Cheplyaka <roma@ro-che.info> wrote:
> > The worse people treat their packages, the sooner!
> >
> > * Carter Schonwald <carter.schonwald@gmail.com> [2014-05-09 09:46:01-0400]
> >> When should we expect a -rc for everything?
> >>
> >> On Friday, May 9, 2014, Roman Cheplyaka <roma@ro-che.info> wrote:
> >>
> >> > http://hackage.haskell.org/package/temporary-rc
> >> >
> >> > I am now looking for backup maintainers for this fork to ensure that a
> >> > similar
> >> > situation won't occur again. Contact me off list if you'd like to become
> >> > one.
> >> >
> >> > * Roman Cheplyaka <roma@ro-che.info <javascript:;>> [2014-05-07
> >> > 10:50:00+0300]
> >> > > Hi Max,
> >> > >
> >> > > are you still maintaining the 'temporary' package?
> >> > > There's a breakage waiting to be fixed (with a patch):
> >> > > https://github.com/batterseapower/temporary/pull/12
> >> > >
> >> > > If I don't hear from you in two days, I'll request maintainership and/or
> >> > > fork the package.
> >> > >
> >> > > Roman
> >> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Libraries mailing list
> > Libraries@haskell.org
> > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
> >