+1 even with the wrinkles involved.<div><br></div><div>If this passes (which seems likely to me), I&#39;d also like to propose adding an instance of Bits to Bool, but we can push that forward separately, I suppose.</div><div>
<br></div><div>-Edward</div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 5:56 AM, Bas van Dijk <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:v.dijk.bas@gmail.com">v.dijk.bas@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
On 15 October 2011 00:01, Ian Lynagh &lt;<a href="mailto:igloo@earth.li">igloo@earth.li</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt; Removing the Num superclass of Bits was also mentioned, but that would<br>
&gt; need its own proposal.<br>
<br>
Ok, I would like to propose removing the Num superclass of Bits.<br>
<br>
This would, for example, enable Vectors to get an instance for Bits:<br>
<a href="http://trac.haskell.org/vector/ticket/59" target="_blank">http://trac.haskell.org/vector/ticket/59</a><br>
<br>
Discussion period: the usual 2 weeks (29 Oct.)<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<br>
Bas<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Libraries mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Libraries@haskell.org">Libraries@haskell.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries" target="_blank">http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>